Satanic Verses, Islam, Allah and his Daughters, Homosexuality and Koran

Charles Gilbert Chaddock

Like the Torah, the Bible, and numerous other religious writings, there is no word for ‘homosexual’ or ‘homosexuality’ in the Koran. The word was not invented until 1892 by Charles Gilbert Chaddock and then was used in a psychological framework (ref: Chaddock, Charles Gilbert (1892), trans. Psychopathia sexualis, with special reference to contrary sexual instinct: a medico-legal study by Richard von Krafft-Ebing. Philadelphia, PA, USA, and London, UK: F. A. Davis Co. Original was published in German in 1886 under the title Psychopathia sexualis : eine klinisch-forensische Studie and the neither the word homosexuelle nor the word Homosexualität appears in the first edition; the one cited here is an authorized translation of the seventh enlarged and revised German edition).  Professor Warren Blumenfeld, of Iowa State University, was kind enough to send me a note that the words “homosexual” and “heterosexual,” actually were coined by Károly Mária Benkert (a.k.a. K.M. Kertbeny) in 1869.  I am not fortunate to have an original copy of it, but learned of him from a Spanish work Pioneros de lo homosexual (Rubí, Barcelona : Anthropos, ©2007, Spanish). I will try to find a copy of the original edition as I am not fond of redactions or reprints. 

Hanging gays in Iran

The original word in the plethora of sacred scripture that was usurped by the hybrid is ‘indecency’ that had a double standard: women condemned of it were sentenced to stay in the house until they died, while males were to be punished according to the Book Women in the Koran (al-Nisa 4:15-16), hanging nor stoning were demanded. In The Heights (al-A’Raf) 7:74-84, the word used is ‘indecent acts’ and is a reference to slaughtering a female camel as a form of worship that required “nakedness”.

Taliban execute two Afghan women

Etymologically, the term awrah derives from the root ‘a-w-r’ that means “defectiveness,” “imperfection,” “blemish” or “weakness.” In Persian and Kurdish (Persian: عورت) as well as Urdu, the word awrat is derived from the Arabic awrah, and had been used widely to mean “woman.”

Muslim youth executed as gay for being handsome

The alleged sin of “indecency” was with the woman and had nothing to do with sex but with her beauty being an entrapment for men of “weak spirit” who could give up Islam (submission) for the sake of sex with the woman, and later any beautiful male who exposed his beauty by not growing a long and scraggly beard to cover his face.  This posed a problem as there was no such prohibition in pre-Islamic Arabic where the love of beauty was praised.  The prohibition came with the advent of patriarchy in a once-matriarchal and matrilineal society that occurred with the invention of the novel religion of ancient Egyptian mercenaries known as Is-Ra-El (Israelites named after the Egyptian Trinity of Isis, Ra, and El—the latter word meaning “master” or “lord” and was associated with an employer as well as a god, usually Horus) when the Koran borrowed heavily from the Torah.

Qadesh goddess of fertility

As in the Torah the word “indecency” that is now associated with sodomy actually meant in its original format a disrobing in front of an individual in quest of sex as a religious ritual to please the gods.  Many times we find this word used to describe Quedesh (also spelled Qadesh) that was and remains a popular name for Egyptian female babies, but also referenced the nude goddess of fertility and wealth ().  The defectiveness of the “indecent acts” was the desire to bring women into the worship of the gods.  To this end, the rule of Islam required women to pray segregated from men so that men would concentrate on their prayers and not on the derrières of the women who might be kneeling in front of them.  Anuses are reserved for the pleasure and view of the gods, but not mortals (ref. The Cow (al-Baqarah) 2:223; cp. Sunan Abu-Dawud, Book 11, Marriage (Kitab Al-Nikah), Number 2159).

al-Uzza daughter of Allah

The word awrat, frequently penned or printed alongside the word za’ifeh (that derives from Arabic za’if, meaning “weak” and sometimes “passive”), has long been associated with femininity and women who lived under the protection and prowess of a man who in the ancient Arabic world found great pleasure in raping his wife to prove his authority and superiority. Any form of femininity in face, figure, mannerism, or especially speech, was considered evil since the gods of the desert, from which came Allah (originally a pig herder) and his three daughters (read: The Star (al-Najm, hereafter cited as Sura 53) 53:19-20: Lat, Uzza, and Manat.  While Allah became, over time, the chief god of Mecca, his daughters were as powerful and popular.  It was not until the sixth century CE (1 HE), that the daughters of an over-sexed Allah were considered evil and the authors of the Satanic Verses.  These are the Satanic Verses:

Have ye thought upon Al-Lat and Al-‘Uzzá
and Manāt, the third, the other?
These are the exalted gharāniq, whose intercession is hoped for.

According to legend, these verses (that still appear in some editions of the Koran) were put in to appease Mecca, a city Muhammad was fighting.  Later, Allah changed his mind on their appropriateness, and rescinded their inclusion  in Pilgrimage (Al-Hajj) 22:52.  Much later, as the Koran was written over the period of Muhammad’s lifetime, Muhammad resumed his attack on Mecca, and belittled the daughters of Allah, in The Star (al-Najm) 53:19-21.  Neither Allah nor his Prophet Muhammad could ever make a decision and stay with it, as the fickle nature of both god and prophet was like wind, constantly churning and turning.

Mannat appears as Artemis

The Bedouin god Allah was sexually connected (sometimes the word is “married”) most of the time to al-Uzza, “the Strong One”, The Most Mighty”, “The Mighty One who was a pre-Islamic Arabian goddess.  Al-Uzza was believed to be a virgin warrior and venerated as the youngest in the triad of goddesses. Al-Uzza was one of the most venerated Arab deities, and the Goddess of the Morning and Evening star: the planet Venus. 

Ishtar Semitic goddess

Ishtar Semitic goddess / al-Uzza

Al-Uzza is the counterpart and equal of the Middle Eastern goddess Ishtar, whom the Greeks referred to as their goddess Aphrodite Urania (Heavenly Aphrodite: purest sexual orgasm).  In other Semitic societies, especially those of Ethiopia and what would become Coptic groups, Al-Uzza was Beltis (a word that translates as “Lady” and is used by other Semitic goddesses associated with the night star who would wed the Morning Star: Satan, a Samarian and Babylonian word for Advocate, not Betrayer, but one who enable others to see what they really were).

Money was developed in order to support the worship of Ishtar

A blood-thirsty goddess, Al-Uzza requires regular ritual sacrifices: both animal and human, and is the deity that demanded the mythological Abraham to slay his son in her honor.  Al-Uzza is still venerated secretly by many desert Muslims, especially Bedouin tribes, and even has a small following in Iran (ancient Persia).  The greatest challenge for Allah was to keep his daughter-wife away from her sisters with whom he also had sex, when not penetrating mortals. Being a god, frequently drunk on wine like the mythological Noah, he was entitled to penetrate any orifice even though mortals had to experience only coitus intercourse. 

Al-Uzzá , Allāt, Manāt, Nemesis required sacrifice by Muhammad

Even his alleged Prophet Muhammad, according to the Koran, recognized this three female Trinity. Hisham ibn al’Kalbi writes in his Kitab al-Asnan (Book of Idols): “We have been told that the Apostle of Allah once mentioned al-Uzza, saying, ‘I have offered a white sheep to al-‘Uzza, while I was a follower of the religion of my people’.” (p. 17)

When Muhammad forced conversions to Islam (a word that means submission; few conversions were voluntary as noted in the Koran), Muhammad denied his claim, although he required his Remembrancers to repeat it frequently so that their future students would ultimately write it down when the Koran was finally written.  Muhammad stated that the words were put into his mouth by Satan and called the verses the Satanic Verses (read: The Star (al-Najm) 53:19-23).

Satanic verses – Top banned books of all time

Neither the semi-literate Remembrancers nor history has forgotten that Muhammad was a pagan and repeated the verses frequently.  This did not change until former camel driver became powerful, invented Islam after returning from his travels in the desert, and forced his hybrid faith on hundreds of thousands by the sword.  We read in Tabari, Annals 1.1192-1193 = Tabari vi: 108-109: “When the Messenger of Allah saw how his tribe turned their backs on him and was grieved to see them shunning the message he had brought to them from Allah, he longed in his soul that something would come to him from Allah that would reconcile him with his tribe. With his love for his tribe and his eagerness for their welfare, it would have delighted him if some of the difficulties which they made for him could have been smoothed, and he debated with himself and fervently desired such an outcome. Then Allah revealed (Sura 53) … and when he came to the words “Have you thought al-Lat and al-Uzza and Manat, the third, the other?” (Sura 53:19-20) Satan cast on his tongue – because of his inner debates and what he desired to bring to his people – the words: “These are the high-flying cranes; verily their intercession is to be hoped for.” When the Quraysh heard this, they rejoiced and were happy and delighted at the way in which he had spoken of their gods, and they listened to him, while the Muslims, having complete trust in their Prophet with respect of the message which he brought from Allah, did not suspect him of error, illusion or mistake.”  By his admission, Muhammad acknowledged Allah was not yet omnipotent, omniscient, nor omnipresent (all-powerful, all-knowing, or everywhere as his elevation to the status of an only god was not yet ready and Allah shared the altars and prayer rugs with a plethora of pagan deities). The rise in the status and stature of Allah would not occur until Arabia would be conquered, synagogues and Christian gathering places closed, slaves taken (women for harems and Blacks as forced workers).

While today’s Iranian ayatollahs (Iran being among the last nations to cave into the invented faith of a purified and sexless Allah) rant against the Satanic Verses and those who even utter the two words are condemned to death by fatwa (read here and here), the Islamization of pagan Arabian religion, the fervent Muslim version of Allah has never escaped from his two daughters al-Lat and al-Uzza. 

Iong before Islam, the Sabeans in Arabia worshipped a moon-god that became Allah’s daughter al-Lat

Both of these superior goddesses continue to appear on top of nearly every mosque and even on the flags of several “Muslim nations” in the form of the Crescent (sacred to the goddess al-Lat: The Cow (al-Baqarah)2:189) and the Star or Planet (the symbol of the power of the goddess al-Uzza:  العزى‎ who had her own temples or mosques, long before Allah was granted similar dignity and reverence).  None of Allah’s daughters were ignored by Muhammad, because Muhammad continued to see the goddess as interceding angels (Sura 53.26-29: see especially verse 26: How many so ever be the angels in the heavens their intercession will avail nothing except after Allah has given leave for whom He pleases and that he is acceptable to Him. Verily it is they who believe not in the life to come, who name the angels with names of females: But herein they have no knowledge: they follow a mere conceit; and mere conceit can never take the place of acceptance of truth). Compare The Ranks (al-Saffat) 37:149-50 and Ornaments of Gold (al-Zukhruf) 43.18-19. True Islam is polytheistic as it is barbaric and blood-thirsty.

Tashkent, This is one of the oldest Quran in the world over1300 years but 100-200 years after Muhammad died

Current copies of the Koran are corrupt, their corruption actually being noted within the Koran itself. The unholy Koran reads in the chapter entitled The Cow (al-Baqarah) 2:106” Such of our revelation as we abrogate or cause to be forgotten, we bring (in place) one better or the like thereof”. Repeatedly Allah makes mistakes, changes his mind, and incorporates superior worship and deities within his own pantheon of mythology according to the principle of nasikh and mansukh, abrogating and abrogated verses, by means of which Allah revokes and alters the announcements of his will; this results in the cancellation of a verse and the substitution of another for it.  The belief in the incorruptibility of the Koran is totally unfounded and imaginary because the Muhammadan records in the Hadiths prove that the Koran that we have today has little resemblance to what Muhammad had in mind in his days. 

The fact that Satan deceived Muhammad at least one time proves how easily this pretender prophet was prone to deception.  If the Satan deceived Muhammad one time, why would not the Satan deceive Muhammad other times, as we find in other Muslim literature?  The Satan of Muhammad was the same celestial advocate in the Babylonian accounts of The Advocate and frequently torments men on order of superior gods and goddesses, as in Job 2:1 where the deity is plural, and in Arabia were the Trinity of Three Daughters as they were in Crete and other ancient civilizations.

Allah became the deity of choice for Muhammad (in much the same way as most early Christian saints were pagan gods or warriors, such as St. George of the Dragon) in a way to win followers to his invented religion.  Al-Uzza was the best choice as she was also the goddess of the Canaanites who styled and named her as Asherah who the daughter of Leban sat on in the tent of Jacob (Genesis 31:19-35; cp. Ide, Arthur Frederick (1991). Yahweh’s Wife: Sex in the Evolution of Monotheism: a Study of Yahweh, Asherah, Ritual Sodomy, and Temple Prostitution. Las Colinas, TX: Monument Press).  

Asherah’s worship was decidedly homosexual (same-sex) and exceedingly popular among females who used her phallic shaped statues to comfort themselves when alone.  It is for this reason that the early prohibition against indecency was directed against women who used the statues of the goddess as artificial penises that proved more comforting than “the staff of life” and “Tree of Life”, both euphemisms for the reproductive penis on which hangs the “fruit of life” to continue reproduction, male community members used for rape and instant sexual gratification.

Burqa-clad woman on a Dagestani beach

The word awrat, as it is used in the Koran has the singular meaning of “vulnerable”.  A hadith (a purported saying or deed of Mohammad that explains the correlation between the Koran term and a woman) reads: “Awrah refers to anything that can easily be harmed just like a bare or exposed place. It becomes clear that the body of the woman is referred to as vulnerable because it is like a house that contains no walls and can be easily harmed and must be covered with appropriate clothing.” This gave rise to the burka or niqab as a way to designate women as unworthy, weak, and vulnerable.  Here the issue of sex refers only to the sexual weakness of women. 

Use of a burka-clad woman suicide bomber by the Taliban to target a United Nations aid centre in Pakistan.

In a patriarchal and authoritarian state where women have no rights, women have no choice but to wear the hated clothing that makes them appear like pillars of salt mirroring the mythology of Lot’s condemned wife, they are slaves to the whim of any man, subject to honour killings and stoning for an alleged adulterous affair even if it was only removing the veil or touching a male who was not a relative, while the male (“who was tempted”) is subject only to a whipping. Chauvinism and sexism is as relevant in Islam.

Honor killings (Islam)

Honour killings not only consumes freedom in pandering Pentecostal and evangelical extremism in Christianity but rapes freedom in the Ultra Orthodox Jewish, Ukrainian and Russian Orthodox community where the senior religious officials, especially bishops in the Ukrainian church encourage people to throw stones at those individuals its bishops reject as “unworthy” and are “indecent” or presumed to be homosexual.  The Russian Orthodox Church is even worse, sending priests to the USA to instill fear and hatred pretending that each is a virtue. 

Honor killings in India

The absurd insanity of honour killings are not only within the Muslim world, but had their origin in Hinduism in India.  Today there are frequent honor killings, especially in crowded areas that are feeling the reality of diversity and multiculturalism as in Bombay and Calcutta.

Hindu religious fanatics have the same cold-blooded thirst for revenge against what each person considers to be a threat, as do Muslims throughout the world.  Hindu honour killings are usually more brutal and frequently include murdering an entire family. Women are the first to be attacked, but males are also targeted by the ignorant steeped in religious mythology that is Hindu, Islam, Christian, or Jewish, for hatred knows no theological boundaries but attacks like starving wolves the defenseless.

Arizona honor killing

Today it infects and inflicts families throughout the USA, from Arizona to Georgia and beyond.  Arizona has become one of the most hate-filled states in the USA, closely followed by the southern tier of states: Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana and Georgia where theology takes precedence over science (with Louisiana Governor Bobbie Jindal leading the charge to reestablish creationism and define evolution as a myth at worse or a theory at best, despite nearly 100 Nobel Laureates writing disclaiming his antediluvian views in support of quality education that nearly no longer exists in the state). 

Honor killing in Georgia

Georgia has an increasing number of such honor killings as if it was filled with adulterers and misfits. Where honor killings occur those who commit the honour killings claim that it is their right to freedom of religion.

Honour killings are gaining support among evangelical extremists in Christianity and Ultra Orthodox Judaism.  Islam is extremely violent in large communities and where any study of diversity and cultures is silenced, downplayed, or scoffed at, especially by politicians who seek to capitalize on the differences, as seen in the baiting of Congressional Representative Michele Bachmann (R-MN).

Koran and Islamic bigotry, sexism, gynophobia and misogyny were engrained in Bedouin and Arabic cultures by Jewish traders who were infested with various ancient Abrahamic myths, beginning with the transmogrified fairytale of Adam (the Hebrew word אָדָם‎ translates as “red earth” but in Islam the Arabic is آدم‎ that is transmogrified into “clot of blood”) and Eve (Hebrew: חַוָּה, or Arabic: حواء‎) means “source of life” and was etymologically, linguistically and in annals of interpretation the superior of the two who shared Gan Eden. 

Naked Noah drunk on new wine (Michelangelo, Sistine ceiling)

The Arabic word awrah or awrat can easily be traced back to the Torah and the last book written that composed the Torah: Genesis.  In Genesis 9:22, anyone can read the painful misogyny in the Hebrew “nakedness”, “nudity”, “shame”, and “indecency” in the word עֶרְוָה (‘ervah). ‘Ervah has the root of ‘arah, which means “to bare” or “to expose oneself”.  By the time the numerous fanatics who penned the myth of Noah and incorporated this worldwide fraud into both the Torah and later the Koran, it meant “genitals” (primarily the penis) that fable declares Noah’s son saw, leading the drunkard to curse not Ham who had been blessed earlier, but instead Ham’s son and Noah’s grandson Canaan. 

The curse was the illogical result of Ham allegedly seeing his father’s penis and scrotum.  Exactly what happened there is no record; some have conjectured that Noah was having intercourse with another woman (since there would be no law prohibiting adultery at that alleged time) but the ark only carried his family and his son’s wives, so if that was the case, the other woman would have been his daughter-in-law, and that was forbidden in Leviticus.  He could have been sodomized, but that, too, is implausible, for Ham told his brothers and they did not stone him for the act; therefore, it did not occur. 

The simplest solution would be a repeat of the alleged sin on Onan “who spilled his seed upon the ground”: masturbation only figuratively as the actual act was coitus interruptus for we find no formal demand for execution of masturbators before the eighteenth century, but in either case the “loss of seed” would prevent the fertilization of an ova and lead to new life that the destroyed planet so desperately needed.  This would have constituted murder and Noah would have been the criminal, and would have died like Onan (Genesis 38:9; cp. Peter Wagner [sic] also printed on some versions as “Anonymous” (1710 and 1712). Onania: or, The Heinous Sin of Self-Pollution, and all its Frightful Consequences in Both Sexes, Considered. London: N.P.; by 1750, the book had gone through nineteen editions, each longer than the last, with the final pages written testimonials on “the vice” that was prohibiting “Virtue and Christian Purity”.  Much of the book is plagiarized from the 1670 publication by “a German physician” who wrote that “mansuprationem” [sic] led to gonorrhoea. Much of this shows the mental imbalance of such frauds as St. Peter Damian who warned people that the “wrath of God and eternal damnation” came to those who touched their “private parts”.  There were numerous calls from clergy (Roman Catholic and later Protestant) to meet the vice with the “force of the Muslimen [sic] and treat it as a form of murder).

What the records state that when the drunken Noah awakened naked in his tent (a prototype for the womb and rebirth) from drinking new wine, he found himself compromised.  It was this compromise that Ham saw, and his viewing it passively made Ham indecent, possibly because he was with his son.  The Talmud goes further than the Torah and takes the word to new lows of sanity by claiming that ‘ervah also means that a woman’s voice is “shameful” as well as “indecent”.

Gender-segregated Islamic prayer in NJ, women relegated to the back

The Hebrew concept of indecency led the man later Christian writers define as Saint Paul to demand that women remain quiet in church (1 Corinthians 14:34), and following Hebrew mythology that forbade women to sing in the synagogue as late as the thirteenth century CE (Kaftor ve-Perah, ed. Abraham Moses Lopez {Jerusalem 1897}, vol I.) so as not to sexually arouse males and lead to thoughts of coitus that was not vaginal (as reflected in the fable of Onan) but the mouth that was considered unclean to receive the “rod of Jesse” (Isaiah 11:1, out of which would come further and future generations) or the penis and the sperm that emits from it when the male was sufficiently aroused to the point of ejaculation. 

Hittite Hebrew אוריה החתי was a soldier in King David s army (possibly Uriah)

The evil that the Abrahamic myth stirred in the Middle East came with the arrival of patriarchal patrimonies from India and Egypt that were protected by Hittites and their Israelite mercenaries who destroyed any sign of femininity then encountered, especially in the worship of Asherah, the goddess of love and fertility, who was known elsewhere as Venus.  Although two prophets of the Old Testament allowed women to sing (Isaiah 54:1 and Zechariah 2:10), the practice that was condemned by Samuel as a curse that would lead men into sinful wanton pleasure was intensified in its vilification by early Christian apostles and their self-serving successors the Paulinists who transmogrified Christianity into a religion of hate by self-appointed bishops, such as Justin Martyr, Irenaeus of Lyons and Augustine of Hippo and his bastard son (uniquely named Adeodatus) by a common whore who had no concept of the teachings of Jesus of the New Testament.  Augustine, “a wild fornicator, with many mistresses, and a bastard son” only lived on the fantasies and distortions of the Pauline school. 

Emperor Constantine I burns Arius books from medieval codex

As I argue in another article, it was this school that issued Letters to congregations redefining and grotesquely distorting the tracts that originally were in Q and various Gospels that the Emperor Constantine I burned along with the writings of Arius and others who declaimed against the imperial church and the ruler who led it and destroyed original Christianity in favour of Paulinity. The original sees of Antioch and Jerusalem were ignored for the more novel and imperial backed backwater basilicas in Rome and Ravenna. This attack on the voice of the female continued throughout the Middle Ages and led to the castration of young males with “beautifully pitched high voices” so that men would not be musing on a woman’s singing (John Plummer ed. (1981), Vox Feminae: Studies in Medieval Women’s Song. Studies in Medieval Culture, XV. (Kalamazoo, MI, Medieval Institute Publications, p. 3; cp. Eric Werner, “Hellenism and Judaism in Christian Music,” Hebrew Union College Annual 20 (1947); p. 443).

Sodomy was a religious rite in nearly every society in the ancient world but was used primarily among married heterosexual couples as a form of birth control.  Male-male intercourse was a ritual within many religious communities where special priests were set aside as Qadesh Zadokite (dog priests or “Enariae”  later defamed as “dog priests”; the word “dog” in its original format translates as “loyal”) who were holy vessels to receive the liquid of life as recipients for the gods.  Muhammad borrowed from this to get the famed Black Stone (Kaaba) that originally housed Arabian gods. The origin of Kubaba may have been kube or kuba meaning ‘cube’: the stone associated with Cybele’s worship. Cybele was later called Allah in Arabia – and worshipped as a part of the CUBE, giving Allah, for a time, dual genders.

Y alchemy used with Kaaba rituals in pre-Islamic Mecca

Hubal (هبل: a pre-Islamic god who had a human form and was thought to control divination) was a lunar deity who most likely originated in Syria and was the son of al-Lāt, grandson of Allah, and the brother of Wadd (known variously as Ilumquh, ʻAmm and Sīn, was the Minaean pagan moon god whose special sign and token were snakes. Snakes were believed to be a sacred symbol and stood for knowledge and medical cure. He is mentioned in the seventy-first chapter known as Noah (Nuh) verse 23, as a deity of the time of the Prophet Noah who was the antecedent of Baachus, the god of wine and drunkenness), Cybele, and Allah were worshipped in pre-Islamic Arabia, notably at the Kaaba in Mecca.  An entire theology was built around this, including Allah who was both male and female, similar to the original YHWH.

The closest to the contemporary reference of the Qadesh is in The Poets (al-Shu’ara) 26:160-173, but it is ritual fornication. The reference in The Ant (al-Naml) 27:45-49 merely condemns men who were not prudent, until v. 55 has Lot stating that men were with men, but this is a gloss (although the Koran is correct in calling Lot’s visitors men, as the modern translation of them being “angels” is a fabrication and not linguistically justified). The only other reference is in The Spider (al-‘Ankabut) 29:27-28, but it is a general lamentation. Lot, again, speaks: “You commit indecent acts which no other nation has committed before you. You lust after men and assault them on your highways.  You turn your very gatherings into orgies.”  The words are simple but the message is obscure. 

The clause “indecent acts which no other nation has committed before you” demonstrates that it was not sodomy as that has a long history depicted in art, engravings, and writings for thousands of years before the myth of Lot was written. Genesis 14-19 shows the Cities of the Plains to be at war, that commerce was hostage to brigands, and that favor with the Kings was rare unless, as with Abram, it would be cultivated by a comely woman.

Abraham sells sister/wife Sarah to King Abimelech

The “gatherings” were commercial profiteers who were male who had come together to sell everything from camels to fabrics, as detailed in the robberies of Abram who sold his wife into sexual slavery (Genesis 12:11-18 ff) only to claim bounty when he threatened extortion and war against the buyer.  Again the “sodomy” is a response to a beautiful (unveiled) female who was traded for cattle and hard goods.

For the “lust after men” it is a reference to a dark desire to have what another man or person has (Exodus 20:17 sq).   It has no relationship to the fable of Lot in Genesis 19, for that tale details how “all the people, men and women, of Sodom” came before the house of the sojourner to learn the

Lot and his daughters at Zoar (Genesis 19)

identies of the men who crept into the town like thieves at night.  While the Koran makes no references to Lot’s drunkenness nor his incest with his daughters, the Torah does include the account (Genesis 19:1-30) of the tryst in the mountains outside of Zoar.

Khadijah bint Khuwaylid was the first wife of the Prophet Muhammad

Khadijah bint Khuwaylid was the first wife of the Prophet Muhammad; this was her home (Rumah Nabi Muhammad Saw dan Sayyidah Khadijah)

“Lust after men” is synonymous with greed, the “men” being common and poor people (commoners and people of the street: the poor and criminal elements found in most societies where the division of wealth is acute and unbalanced).  This lust leads to theft of purse or camel and has no relationship to committing rape on any road.  

Aisha age 8 and Muhammad age 54

It is not a sexual reference nor a threat or promise of any form of coitus if the bargain is between men, but rather a subtle warning if one of the traders was a woman, as with Muhammad’s first and far older wife Khadijah (he was 23 and she was 40) whom he married and took over her camel caravan (of 8000 camels) trade. At most it is a term used by predators who few wayfarers on the highway as weak and vulnerable, and thus are taunted and raped as if they were women as women had less value than men (Bukhari 62:58; on Muhammad’s twelve wives, one—Aisha—only seven years old, and numerous concubines, read here).   

Afghanistan Muslims behead convert from Islam to Christianity (required by Allah in the Koran)

Since most of Islam is hybrid the “gatherings” were public meetings, as in an open market and the orgy references to haggling over price, a common custom but which was better understood as the negotiation of Jews who were merchants and thus considered unfit for salvation (obtaining a commission on a trade or sale). There is no death penalty for any of these alleged homosexual acts anywhere in the Koran, even though the Koran is the most violent, bloodthirsty volume told to the uneducated who lived in a world of violence. Muhammad became one of the great butchers and pedophiles of the world, massacring entire villages and desecrating corpses.

Muslim intolerance (2012)

Even though every chapter in the Koran begins with the pious ejaculation: “In the name of God, the Compassionate, the Merciful”, there is no evidence in the Koran that Allah has or exercises any of those attributes.  The reverse is true, unfortunately, but in keeping with the gods of the Bedouins, Jews, Christians and numerous other cults. Allah rules by threats of violence and death, he is the ultimate Satan (Advocate) to weigh the soul of the individual and damn it to “the Fires”.  “As for the man or woman who is guilty of theft, cut off their (sic) hands to punish them for their crimes.  That is the punishment enjoined by God” (The Table (al-Ma’idah) 5:38). 

Many Muslims love Hitler

Allah becomes the prototype of and for Adolf Hitler who many Muslims revere as fulfilling the promise of the Koran in ending the Jewish problem and enabling the disbelievers who had not accepted Allah to feel forever the Fires of Hell: “For the wrongdoers We have prepared a fire which will encompass them like the walls of a pavilion.  When they cry out for help they shall be showered with a water as hot as molten brass, which will scald their faces. Evil shall be their drink, dismal their resting place” (The Cave (al-Kafh) 18:29). 

A man convicted of theft had his right hand and left foot cut off as required by the Koran.

Allah promises that those who make war on himself or Muhammad will be killed or crucified “or have their hands, and feet on alternate sides cut off” (5:33). Allah promises, in the second chapter (sura) of the Koran, known as The Cow (al-Baqarah), to torture nonbelievers “forever after they die” (2:10), and will burn those who attempt to compose a sura “better than those in the Koran” thereby rejecting private authorship (2:24). “Allah will shed human blood while angels praise him in heaven” (2:30) as “there will come a day when Allah will refuse all prayers and help no one” (2:48) as Allah brags about drowning the Egyptian army (2:50).  “Christians and Jews will suffer in this life and go to hell in the next” (2.85). “They [the disbelievers] have incurred anger upon anger. For disbelievers is a shameful doom” (2:90, 104) “Allah will make disbelievers’ lives miserable in this world and torture them forever after they die.” (2:114). “And you will not be asked about the owners of hell-fire [they are the non-Muslims]” (2:119). “The doom of the disbelievers will not be lightened” (2:162). Allah says that you must keep fighting until there is no more persecution [of Muslims] and everyone on earth is a Muslim. They you can stop killing people (2:193a). But if there are any wrong-doers around after you have killed off all the disbelievers, persecutors [of Muslims] and aggressors [against Muslims], then you will have to kill them, too (2:193b).  

Islam is to dominate the world

Islam is to dominate the world.  All people will become Muslims or be killed.

War is ordained by Allah, and all Muslims must be willing to fight, whether they like it or not (2:216).  In Chapter 3 The Imrans (al-‘Imran) Those who disbelieve the revelations of Allah, theirs will be a heavy doom (3:4). Those who disbelieve will be fuel for the fire (3:10). All non-Muslims will be rejected by Allah after they die (3:85). The fourth chapter, Women (al-Nisa) Allah decrees that Muslims are to have no unbelieving friends. Kill the unbelievers wherever you find them (4:89).

Muslims vow to kill all Jews

For the wrongdoing Jews, Allah has prepared a painful doom (4:160-161), despite the fact that Muslims argue that they are directly descended from Abraham and his bastard son Ishmael.  Abraham and Ishmael are revered as prophets, and the Jews are even called “People of the Book”.  That does not deter today’s Muslims from open warfare against Jews either with suicide attacks, murder, or poisoning with bombs set off within hospitals and schools, even if it means the slaughter of other Muslims to “rid the world of Jewry”. 

Child terrorist

No age is respected as both females and males of all ages are subject to the ravages of jihad and Islam’s code of genocide. Children as young as five years of age have been sent girdled with explosives to blow up Israeli buses and checkpoints.

As if Martin Luther were writing the Koran, one reads the repetition that centuries later is used by the German Augustinian when he demanded in his catechism that Christians had to stand in “fear and trembling” before god, as the fifth chapter of the Koran: The Table (al-Ma’idah) dictates: “Fear me!” (5:3). Christians will be burned in the fire [of hell] (5:72). Those who deny the truth of Islam will be punished by Allah (6:6) an integrated part of the chapter entitled Cattle (al-An’am).  These Mephistophelean ministering by the madman Muhammad continue throughout his pornographic infect volume unabated, his god a whoring war monger more evil than any mortal measuring from Cassius to Hitler, and the paradise of the Muslim world a brothel of bating, badgering, bigotry: Entire nations have entered the Fire. Some get a double treatment (7:38 in The Heights, known in Arabic as al-A’Raf), but even the allegedly saved have no guarantee as the Koran goes further: Those in the Garden will plead with Allah not to be cast into the Fire (7:47) … Those in the Fire will cry out to those in heaven, saying, “Pour water on us” but All has forbidden that to disbelievers (7:50). 

 The Koran is nothing less than a bad plagiarism of far older writings, especially matching those of the Jews of Mecca he visited with before he went insane and fled into the desert like Moses haunted by the sacred Egyptian calf (Yah; the original Yahweh was a Samarian bull god): “Those who worship the calf will suffer terror and humiliation from Allah” (7:152).  The promise of divine wrath for “changing the word” is but a repetition of the promise in the Babylonian Book of Daniel (cf. 12:9 which is a reinterpretation of an Assyrian myth), and the revision by another lunatic: John of Patmos who penned his Apocalypse (Revelation 22:18-19).

World control

As with all other Middle Eastern religions, the emphasis was on strict adherence to the gods of the tribes, and to produce male children who would become warriors for a vengeful and hate-filled god. It must be remembered that the Koran was given to an illiterate camel tender, Muhammad by an angel who “revealed” the Koran to him, unlike Moses who YHWH physically chiseled and gave stone tablets to on his way out of Egypt. Muhammad’s angel’s name was Gabriel, the same Gabriel in the Book of Daniel (but the writers of this tale call Gabriel a man; Gabriel foretells the birth of Jesus and John the Baptist in the Gospel of Luke (1:11-38).  Gabriel is elevated to the status of archangel by the Imperial church after 380 CE, and is the prototype of the angel that comes to the founder of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints: Joseph Smith who received his golden tablets from Moroni the son of the warrior-priest Mormoni (Book of Mormon, Moroni 1-3 read here) and had to translate them with stones from Moses’ brother Aaron’s breastplate  (Leviticus 8:8: האורים והתומים‎; they were actually from the far older civilizations of Assyria and Babylon, cp. 2 Samuel 28:3-6) with his head buried in a hat or standing behind a curtain) for the singular reason of developing a cult of personality.

Like Joseph Smith, who ran for president in 1844, Muhammad could not read nor write, he was not a great orator and what prophecies are accorded to him can be found in other Arabic (pagan), Christian, Jewish, Greek and Latin literature; but Muhammad had his Remembrancers memorize what he said.  Over the next two hundred years before anything was codified, numerous marginalia were inserted as part of the actual Koran (a word that literally means “recitation”)—a book, like the golden plates, special glasses and sorcery stones of Smith, have since been lost. Unlike Joseph Smith who received the entire book of Mormon at one time, Muhammad was entrusted with the Koran over a period of twenty-three years, beginning in 609 CE and ending with his death in 632 CE.  The Koran had several variances and redactions.  It was not until the third Caliph Uthman that there was any effort made to standardize the work, allowing for various innovations and insertions to change its text and meaning. Like the Christian Bible that started out with fifty copies as ordered by the Eastern Emperor of the Bishop of Caesarea, Eusebius, the Koran originally had only five copies with one sent to each of the major Muslim cities that had only outward allegiance to any of the others.  Rather than being a book of guidance, the Koran makes no pretense that it is also an enfeebled attempt to write hortatory history and embellish on reality emphasizing moral significance of an act rather than explaining narrative sequences of the day.

Fighting for Allah

The murderous mad maneuverings of Arabian ayatollahs (archbishops) follows only the distorted dicta of the corrupt Koran, repeatedly rewritten and changed, its scribes adding and subtracting at will as old Remembrancers forget what they had memorized or move words to fit the current situation or hold back on the evolution of time in a manner matching the meanderings of the German pope and former Nazi Youth Josef Ratzinger.  Their toil transmogrified whatever was the genuine message of hope (that Muhammad forfeited early during his bloody crusades against other Arabs) into a blast on the trumpet of perdition and discord. This is keenly known in Iran, a nation devoted to a paper product rather than a counsel of assistance to those less fortunate.

Iran military women

To counsel with or make privy social intercourse with Iran is equal to bringing a boar in a tuxedo to the dinner table hosted by the Tea/Republican Party in the USA, that, intellectually like Rush Limbaugh, Michele Bachmann, and Mitt Romney  is four cans short of a six-pack.

2 Comments

Filed under Church history, Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (Mormons), Homosexuality, Islam, Doctrines, Islam, History

2 responses to “Satanic Verses, Islam, Allah and his Daughters, Homosexuality and Koran

  1. Pingback: Roanoke, Virginia’s Christian cabal and the words of the New Testament Jesus | Arthur Frederick Ide's Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s